On 20/02/2024 10:36, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 09:16:43AM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 19/02/2024 20:02, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 01:14:23PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Request can be NULL if no guilty request was identified so simply use
engine->i915 instead.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: d50892a9554c ("drm/i915: switch from drm_debug_printer() to device specific drm_dbg_printer()")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks Rodrigo!
Given how d50892a9554c landed via drm-misc-next, Maxime or Thomas - could
you take this via drm-misc-next-fixes or if there will be another
drm-misc-next pull request?
There will be a drm-misc-next PR on thursday
Could you pull this one into which branch is needed so it appears in
that pull request?
Regards,
Tvrtko
