On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 09:16:43AM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 19/02/2024 20:02, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 01:14:23PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Request can be NULL if no guilty request was identified so simply use
> > > engine->i915 instead.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Fixes: d50892a9554c ("drm/i915: switch from drm_debug_printer() to device specific drm_dbg_printer()")
> > > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks Rodrigo!
>
> Given how d50892a9554c landed via drm-misc-next, Maxime or Thomas - could
> you take this via drm-misc-next-fixes or if there will be another
> drm-misc-next pull request?
There will be a drm-misc-next PR on thursday
Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
