Hello Krzysztof, On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 07:44:53PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 15/02/2024 11:02, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:23:02AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 08/02/2024 11:43, Lee Jones wrote: > >>> Applied, thanks! > >>> > >>> [3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format > >>> commit: cb946db1335b599ece363d33966bf653ed0fa58a > >>> > >> > >> Next is still failing. > > > > Failing in the sense of dtbs_check, right? > > No, bindings were failing. dt_binding_check. This must not fail, so kind > of bummer... > > >> Dharma, > >> You must explain and clearly mark dependencies between patches. > >> > >> Lee, > >> Can you pick up two previous patches as well? > > > > I applied the pwm patch now. If Lee wants to pick up this one via his > > tree that would be fine for me, too. If that's the case please tell me, > > then I'll drop it from my for-next branch again. Feel free to add > > my Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> for patch > > #2 then. > > At least next is happy. The pwm binding is in next now (as 0fa319a1427f7c8d0af4c255316624f7e6f649a0) but dt_binding_check still tells me (among others): Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,hlcdc.yaml: Error in referenced schema matching $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/atmel/atmel,hlcdc-display-controller.yaml This is what you meant, right? This goes away as soon as the first patch (dt-bindings: display: convert Atmel's HLCDC to DT schema) is applied, too. So next isn't completely happy yet. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
