On 15/02/2024 11:02, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:23:02AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 08/02/2024 11:43, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Fri, 02 Feb 2024 05:47:33 +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote: >>>> Convert the atmel,hlcdc binding to DT schema format. >>>> >>>> Align clocks and clock-names properties to clearly indicate that the LCD >>>> controller expects lvds_pll_clk when interfaced with the lvds display. This >>>> alignment with the specific hardware requirements ensures accurate device tree >>>> configuration for systems utilizing the HLCDC IP. >>>> >>>> [...] >>> >>> Applied, thanks! >>> >>> [3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format >>> commit: cb946db1335b599ece363d33966bf653ed0fa58a >>> >> >> Next is still failing. > > Failing in the sense of dtbs_check, right? No, bindings were failing. dt_binding_check. This must not fail, so kind of bummer... > >> Dharma, >> You must explain and clearly mark dependencies between patches. >> >> Lee, >> Can you pick up two previous patches as well? > > I applied the pwm patch now. If Lee wants to pick up this one via his > tree that would be fine for me, too. If that's the case please tell me, > then I'll drop it from my for-next branch again. Feel free to add > my Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> for patch > #2 then. At least next is happy. > Best regards, Krzysztof
