On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 02:43:16PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > On 12/4/23 15:55, Maxime Ripard wrote: > >> Okay, that means s/_locked/_nolock/ in drm_gem_shmem_helpers.{c,h}, I > >> guess. > > DRM subsys and majority of kernel uses common _locked postfix. We should > retain the old naming scheme by using _locked() in DRM. It's not > worthwhile changing the name to a much less popular variant for a no > good reason. > > Maxime, are you okay with keeping the _locked name? Yeah... I still don't really like it, but you're right that it's best to remain consistent over my opinion :) Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature