Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 11:15:29AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:51:06 +0200
> Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon,  4 Dec 2023 13:17:06 +0100
> > Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > The current documentation of drm_atomic_state says that it's the "global
> > > state object". This is confusing since, while it does contain all the
> > > objects affected by an update and their respective states, if an object
> > > isn't affected by this update it won't be part of it.
> > > 
> > > Thus, it's not truly a "global state", unlike object state structures
> > > that do contain the entire state of a given object.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> could you figure out how your email got the linux.ie address for Dave
> Airlie?
> 
> I got a bounce from skynet.ie when replying to all. Maybe there is a
> leftover email address for Dave still somewhere?

Yep. In my mutt aliases file :)

It's fixed now, thanks

Maxime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux