Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:51:06 +0200
Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon,  4 Dec 2023 13:17:06 +0100
> Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > The current documentation of drm_atomic_state says that it's the "global
> > state object". This is confusing since, while it does contain all the
> > objects affected by an update and their respective states, if an object
> > isn't affected by this update it won't be part of it.
> > 
> > Thus, it's not truly a "global state", unlike object state structures
> > that do contain the entire state of a given object.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Maxime,

could you figure out how your email got the linux.ie address for Dave
Airlie?

I got a bounce from skynet.ie when replying to all. Maybe there is a
leftover email address for Dave still somewhere?


Thanks,
pq

Attachment: pgpi290DmwUfE.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux