On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 12:39:02PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 28 Nov 2023, Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 11:44:26AM +0530, Vignesh Raman wrote: > >> Hi Mani, > >> > >> On 28/11/23 10:44, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > >> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 09:50:26AM +0530, Vignesh Raman wrote: > >> > > Commit a2458d8f618a ("PCI/ASPM: pci_enable_link_state: Add argument > >> > > to acquire bus lock") has added an argument to acquire bus lock > >> > > in pci_enable_link_state, but qcom_pcie_enable_aspm calls it > >> > > without this argument, resulting in below build error. > >> > > > >> > > >> > Where do you see this error? That patch is not even merged. Looks like you are > >> > sending the patch against some downstream tree. > >> > >> I got this error with drm-tip - git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-tip > >> > >> This commit is merged in drm-intel/topic/core-for-CI - > >> https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel/log/?h=topic/core-for-CI > >> > > > > Okay. Since this patch is just for CI, please do not CC linux-pci as it causes > > confusion. > > Agreed. More on-topic for linux-pci is what happened with [1]. > > We've been running CI with that for months now to avoid lockdep splats, > and it's obviously in everyone's best interest to get a fix upstream. > Yes, ofc. Right now we have 2 series/patches to fix the locking issue: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230321233849.3408339-1-david.e.box@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20231128081512.19387-1-johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx/ Bjorn has to choose one among them. - Mani > David, Bjorn? > > > BR, > Jani. > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230321233849.3408339-1-david.e.box@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > > > - Mani > > > >> Regards, > >> Vignesh > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்