On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 7:20 AM Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx> > > [ Upstream commit c63079c61177ba1b17fa05c6875699a36924fe39 ] > > For pptable structs that use flexible array sizes, use flexible arrays. > > Suggested-by: Felix Held <felix.held@xxxxxxx> > Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2894 > Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> FWIW, I don't think any of these UBSAN variable sized array changes are really stable material. They are not really fixing an actual issue just making UBSAN happy. Alex > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/pptable.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/pptable.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/pptable.h > index 4c2eec49dadc9..94947229888ba 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/pptable.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/pptable.h > @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ typedef struct _ATOM_PPLIB_THERMALCONTROLLER > typedef struct _ATOM_PPLIB_STATE > { > UCHAR ucNonClockStateIndex; > - UCHAR ucClockStateIndices[1]; // variable-sized > + UCHAR ucClockStateIndices[]; // variable-sized > } ATOM_PPLIB_STATE; > > > -- > 2.42.0 >
