Re: [PATCH 4/5] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Powkiddy RK2023

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 07:45:17PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hey Chris,
> 
> Am Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2023, 16:43:56 CEST schrieb Chris Morgan:
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 11:21:47AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 18/10/2023 18:18, Chris Morgan wrote:
> > > > From: Chris Morgan <macromorgan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > 
> > > > The Powkiddy RK2023 is a handheld gaming device made by Powkiddy and
> > > > powered by the Rockchip RK3566 SoC.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Morgan <macromorgan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 5 +++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> > > > index a349bf4da6bc..a6612185a7ff 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> > > > @@ -674,6 +674,11 @@ properties:
> > > >            - const: powkiddy,rgb30
> > > >            - const: rockchip,rk3566
> > > >  
> > > > +      - description: Powkiddy RK2023
> > > > +        items:
> > > > +          - const: powkiddy,rk2023
> > > 
> > > This cuold be just enum in previous entry :/ but I remember we talked
> > > about this once with Heiko.
> > 
> > For hardware that requires a different device tree, is that possible?
> > While most of the devices I've worked on for the RK3566 series are very
> > similar for the moment only 1 is identical (the RG353P and the RG353M)
> > and can use the same device tree.
> 
> In my reply I pointed to the Rock PI 4A/4A+/B/B+/C family, which also has
> different devicetrees but is part of the same family of device designs.
> 
> So similar Powkiddy RK3568 based gaming handhelds also sound like
> a nice family name in the description ;-) .

Gotcha, I can do that. Would you like for me to go back and do the same
for the Anbernic devices as well? I can do it as part of a seperate
patch series.

Thank you.

> 
> 
> Heiko
> 
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux