On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 05:09:07PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote: > On 2023/9/21 16:47, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Adding Paul in Cc > > > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 04:25:50PM +0800, suijingfeng wrote: > > > On 2023/9/19 21:12, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > We've had a number of times when a patch slipped through and we couldn't > > > > pick them up either because our MAINTAINERS entry only covers the > > > > framework and thus we weren't Cc'd. > > > > > > > > Let's take another approach where we match everything, and remove all > > > > the drivers that are not maintained through drm-misc. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > MAINTAINERS | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++--- > > > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > > > index 90f13281d297..757d4f33e158 100644 > > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > > > @@ -6860,12 +6860,29 @@ M: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> > > > > S: Maintained > > > > W: https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/maintainer-tools/drm-misc.html > > > > T: git git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc > > > > +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ > > > > +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/ > > > > F: Documentation/gpu/ > > > > -F: drivers/gpu/drm/* > > > > +F: drivers/gpu/drm/ > > > > F: drivers/gpu/vga/ > > > > -F: include/drm/drm* > > > > +F: include/drm/drm > > > > F: include/linux/vga* > > > > -F: include/uapi/drm/drm* > > > > +F: include/uapi/drm/ > > > > +X: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/ > > > > +X: drivers/gpu/drm/armada/ > > > > +X: drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/ > > > > +X: drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/ > > > > +X: drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/ > > > > +X: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/ > > > > +X: drivers/gpu/drm/imx/ > > > > +X: drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ > > > > +X: drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/ > > > > +X: drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/ > > > > +X: drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ > > > > +X: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/ > > > > +X: drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ > > > > +X: drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/ > > > > +X: drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/ > > > > DRM DRIVERS FOR ALLWINNER A10 > > > > M: Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Nice patch! > > > > > > Well, I'm just curious about why the drm/ingenic and drm/gma500 are not maintained through drm-misc? > > > > > > As far as I know: > > > 1) the drm/ingenic driver don't have a "T" annotation (location of the link). > > Yeah, I wasn't sure about that one indeed. I remained conservative since it's a > > sensitive topic for some. > > > > Paul, is drm/ingenic supposed to be maintained through drm-misc? Either way, > > could you clarify which git tree is supposed to merge those patches in > > MAINTAINERS? > > > > > 2) the "T" of drm/gma500 is "git git://github.com/patjak/drm-gma500", but the > > code for this link is not up to date. > > > > For gma500, I think it's mostly historical since it was there before drm-misc > > was a thing. > > > > > I think at least the drm/ingenic and drm/gma500 drivers are *actually* > > > maintained through drm-misc, So perhaps, these two drivers should not be > > > excluded. Am I correct? > > It's likely :) > > > > Either way, I think it can be solved/clarified later on > > > OK, that's sound fairly enough. I will respect you and Paul's opinion. > By the way, I also want to say that I think the drm/imb and various drm/imx drivers > are also belong to the drm-misc. They are also lack the "T" annotation. > Hopes someone can help to check that. Thanks. > Thanks for the patch. As far as I know, imx is kind of in-between at the moment. Some patches are going through drm-misc, but others are coming through their tree. For kmb (if that's what you meant), then I would expect intel to do the maintenance like they do for i915. But given this discussion it could be a good idea to add all the maintainers of those excluded drivers in Cc in the next revision. Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
