Hi,
On 2023/9/19 21:12, Maxime Ripard wrote:
We've had a number of times when a patch slipped through and we couldn't
pick them up either because our MAINTAINERS entry only covers the
framework and thus we weren't Cc'd.
Let's take another approach where we match everything, and remove all
the drivers that are not maintained through drm-misc.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
---
MAINTAINERS | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 90f13281d297..757d4f33e158 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -6860,12 +6860,29 @@ M: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx>
S: Maintained
W: https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/maintainer-tools/drm-misc.html
T: git git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc
+F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/
+F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/
F: Documentation/gpu/
-F: drivers/gpu/drm/*
+F: drivers/gpu/drm/
F: drivers/gpu/vga/
-F: include/drm/drm*
+F: include/drm/drm
F: include/linux/vga*
-F: include/uapi/drm/drm*
+F: include/uapi/drm/
+X: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/
+X: drivers/gpu/drm/armada/
+X: drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/
+X: drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/
+X: drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/
+X: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/
+X: drivers/gpu/drm/imx/
+X: drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/
+X: drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/
+X: drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/
+X: drivers/gpu/drm/msm/
+X: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/
+X: drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/
+X: drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/
+X: drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/
DRM DRIVERS FOR ALLWINNER A10
M: Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx>
Nice patch!
Well, I'm just curious about why the drm/ingenic and drm/gma500 are not maintained through drm-misc?
As far as I know:
1) the drm/ingenic driver don't have a "T" annotation (location of the link).
2) the "T" of drm/gma500 is "git git://github.com/patjak/drm-gma500", but the code for this link is not up to date.
I think at least the drm/ingenic and drm/gma500 drivers are *actually* maintained through drm-misc,
So perhaps, these two drivers should not be excluded. Am I correct?
