On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 12:11 AM Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [...] > > That makes sense. I had based this series on drm-misc-next which > didn't have those, but now that a new -rc1 is out it then > drm-misc-next should rebase shortly. I'll make sure that the next > version includes Uwe's changes as much as possible. > > That being said, I also wouldn't object if the maintainer of this DRM > driver wanted to resolve conflicts themselves and land the patch > without me needing to resend. The conflict is trivial, there are no > dependencies and no reason to land the series all at once, so landing > this patch early would mean less spam for the maintainer since they > would no longer get CCed on future versions. :-P Just sayin... Oh then feel free to ignore that if the changes weren't in the tree at that time... It was just a gentle reminder. Thanks for clarifying. :) Regards, Fei > > -Doug
