On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 12:12:58PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 9:45 AM Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > As per our discussion, in V2 we will make drm_panel_remove() actually > > unprepare / disable a panel if it was left enabled. This would > > essentially fold in the drm_panel_helper_shutdown() from my RFC patch. > > This would make tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_remove() behave the same as it > > did before. Ugh, though I may have to think about this more when I get > > to implementation since I don't think there's a guarantee of the > > ordering of shutdown calls between the DRM driver and the panel. > > Anyway, something to discuss later. > > Ugh, ignore the above paragraph. I managed to confuse myself and was > thinking about shutdown but talking about remove. Sigh. :( Instead, > pretend the above paragraph said: > > As per our discussion, in V2 we will make drm_panel_remove() actually > unprepare / disable a panel (and print a warning) if it was left > enabled. This would essentially fold in the > drm_panel_helper_shutdown() from my RFC patch (but add a warning). > This would make tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_remove() behave the same as it > did before with the addition of a warning if someone tries to remove a > currently powered panel. Ok, that works for me :) Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
