Hi, On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 9:45 AM Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > As per our discussion, in V2 we will make drm_panel_remove() actually > unprepare / disable a panel if it was left enabled. This would > essentially fold in the drm_panel_helper_shutdown() from my RFC patch. > This would make tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_remove() behave the same as it > did before. Ugh, though I may have to think about this more when I get > to implementation since I don't think there's a guarantee of the > ordering of shutdown calls between the DRM driver and the panel. > Anyway, something to discuss later. Ugh, ignore the above paragraph. I managed to confuse myself and was thinking about shutdown but talking about remove. Sigh. :( Instead, pretend the above paragraph said: As per our discussion, in V2 we will make drm_panel_remove() actually unprepare / disable a panel (and print a warning) if it was left enabled. This would essentially fold in the drm_panel_helper_shutdown() from my RFC patch (but add a warning). This would make tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_remove() behave the same as it did before with the addition of a warning if someone tries to remove a currently powered panel. -Doug
