Hi Javier, On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 11:33 AM Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> >> penguin in test004 is not displayed correctly. I was expecting that to be > >> >> working correctly since you mentioned to be using the Linux logo on boot. > >> > > >> > Linux has logos for displays using 2, 16, and 256 colors. Note that the > >> > default logos are 80x80, which is larger than your display, so no logo > >> > is drawn. > >> > Fbtest has only the full color logo, so it will look bad on a monochrome > >> > display. > >> > >> I see. Should the test check for minimum num_colors and skip that test then? > > > > The test still works (you did see an ugly black-and-white penguin), doesn't it? > > Fair enough. But when it defaulted to XRGB8888, it looked better. So I > thought that it was a regression. No strong opinion though if the test > should be skipped or not. IC, fbtest's mono_match_color() just finds the closest color (black or white), while drm_fb_xrgb8888_to_gray8_line() uses a weighted average of the RGB components. That might make a small but visible difference. We could make it look even better using Floyd-Steinberg dithering... ;-) Fbtest does have an unused match_color_error() helper, so I must have had that in mind, initially... Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds