Hello Maxime, On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 05:47:54PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > So, on the record, we have 1 drm-misc maintainer, 1 intel GPU > maintainer, 1 amdgpu/radeon/dma-buf maintainer and one former drm-misc > maintainer pretty much against, or at best skeptical. And you don't have So now it's proven that the people who at the time when I prepared the 2nd series have mainly criticised that I did the crtc rename in several patches instead of one are pretty high in the food chain. Yes, there was a strong "no", but the others were (at that time and in my understanding of their public mails) ok with the idea. So I still think the suggestion that I ignored concerns isn't justified. Today I'm not convinced any more that sending an updated series was a good idea, and I excused me for the misunderstanding it produced. I experience your mail that underlines your allegation heavy-handed without considering my reasoning and excuse as aggressive, too. I'll put aside my effort to improve the drm code now. Thanks Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
