Re: [PATCH 00/17] drm: rename various struct members "dev" -> "drm"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Maxime,

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 05:47:54PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> So, on the record, we have 1 drm-misc maintainer, 1 intel GPU
> maintainer, 1 amdgpu/radeon/dma-buf maintainer and one former drm-misc
> maintainer pretty much against, or at best skeptical. And you don't have

So now it's proven that the people who at the time when I prepared the
2nd series have mainly criticised that I did the crtc rename in several
patches instead of one are pretty high in the food chain. Yes, there
was a strong "no", but the others were (at that time and in my
understanding of their public mails) ok with the idea. So I still think
the suggestion that I ignored concerns isn't justified.

Today I'm not convinced any more that sending an updated series was a
good idea, and I excused me for the misunderstanding it produced.

I experience your mail that underlines your allegation heavy-handed
without considering my reasoning and excuse as aggressive, too.

I'll put aside my effort to improve the drm code now.

Thanks
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux