Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 04:10:23PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: [...] >> - Javier Martinez Canillas >> Generally in favour (also via irc) >> Wants a single patch >> naming: drm > drm_dev > dev > > drm-misc driver maintainer > Just to clarify my position on this. I did agree that "dev" was confusing for me when I started hacking on DRM/KMS and I believe that "drm" is more readable. I.e: in my drivers I use "struct drm_device *drm = plane->dev". But I think that all the discussion and energy *already spent* on this series makes it a net negative, regardless of the code's end result. -- Best regards, Javier Martinez Canillas Core Platforms Red Hat
