On 7/13/23 10:53, Jocelyn Falempe wrote: > On 13/07/2023 10:32, Michel Dänzer wrote: >> On 7/12/23 17:25, Jocelyn Falempe wrote: >>> On 12/07/2023 17:05, Sui Jingfeng wrote: >>>> On 2023/7/10 16:07, Jocelyn Falempe wrote: >>>> >>>>> On the other hand, are there any drawback to present a BMC connector even when the hardware doesn't have it ? >>>> >>>> If not properly setting up, I think you will create two encoder and two connector in the system. >>> >>> Yes, but I think it won't have any visible effect for the end-user. >> >> I'm afraid user-space display servers would waste effort producing content for a non-existing BMC (assuming its connector status is connected or unknown). >> >> > I think it's already the case, as AST's DP and VGA connectors currently always report "connected" status. And they all share the same crtc, so there is only one framebuffer, that is always active. "Single CRTC" is the piece of information I was missing. Never mind then. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | https://redhat.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and Xwayland developer
