On 05.06.23 12:18, Johan Hovold wrote: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 01:05:36PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >> On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 at 13:02, Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Virtual terminals are still broken with 6.4-rc5 on the Lenovo ThinkPad >>> X13s two weeks after I reported this, and there has been no indication >>> of any progress in the other related thread: >>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZHYPHnWoDbXB-fqe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> Seems like it is time to merge this revert to get this sorted. BTW, thx for bringing this to my attention! >>> Rob, Abhinav, Dmitry, can either of you merge this one and get it into >>> 6.4-rc6? >> >> Rob sent the pull request few hours ago, see >> https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/CAF6AEGuHujkFjRa6ys36Uyh0KUr4Hd16u1EMqJo8tOZ3ifVubQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Ok, so you guys went with the module parameter hack. Whatever. As long > as the regression is finally fixed. Yup. Let me tell regzbot about the fix: #regzbot fix: drm/msm/dp: add module parameter for PSR #regzbot ignore-activity > Next time, some visibility into your process would be appreciated to > avoid unnecessary work. Yeah, that's something we IMHO sooner or later need to improve for all of kernel development -- among others to give people that find existing bug reports a chance to find patches that were posted or applied to address the issue (and of course reporters also, like in this case). Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.
