On Mon, 15 May 2023 at 20:47, Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 5/14/2023 2:46 PM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > On 2023-05-12 21:19:19, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > <snip.
> >>> +static inline void dpu_hw_dsc_bind_pingpong_blk_1_2(struct dpu_hw_dsc *hw_dsc,
> >>> + const enum dpu_pingpong pp)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *hw;
> >>> + const struct dpu_dsc_sub_blks *sblk;
> >>> + int mux_cfg = 0xf; /* Disabled */
> >>> +
> >>> + hw = &hw_dsc->hw;
> >>> +
> >>> + sblk = hw_dsc->caps->sblk;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (pp)
> >>> + mux_cfg = (pp - PINGPONG_0) & 0x7;
> >> Do we need an unbind support here like we do for the DSC 1.1?
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, sblk->ctl.base + DSC_CTL, mux_cfg);
> >>> +}
> > <snip>
> >
> > Friendly request to strip/snip unneeded context (as done in this reply)
> > to make it easier to spot the conversation, and replies to it.
> >
> > - Marijn
>
> Thanks for suggestion.
>
> How can I do that?
>
> just manually delete unneeded context?
>
> Or are they other way (tricks) to do it automatically?
No automation can deduce what is irrelevant to the mail. So we do this manually.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
