On 2023-05-12 21:19:19, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
<snip.
> > +static inline void dpu_hw_dsc_bind_pingpong_blk_1_2(struct dpu_hw_dsc *hw_dsc,
> > + const enum dpu_pingpong pp)
> > +{
> > + struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *hw;
> > + const struct dpu_dsc_sub_blks *sblk;
> > + int mux_cfg = 0xf; /* Disabled */
> > +
> > + hw = &hw_dsc->hw;
> > +
> > + sblk = hw_dsc->caps->sblk;
> > +
> > + if (pp)
> > + mux_cfg = (pp - PINGPONG_0) & 0x7;
>
> Do we need an unbind support here like we do for the DSC 1.1?
>
> > +
> > + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, sblk->ctl.base + DSC_CTL, mux_cfg);
> > +}
<snip>
Friendly request to strip/snip unneeded context (as done in this reply)
to make it easier to spot the conversation, and replies to it.
- Marijn
