Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, 5 Apr 2023 at 18:54, Javier Martinez Canillas > <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> writes: [...] >> >> Yeah, agreed that if vga_remove_vgacon() isn't enough and another helper >> is needed then starts to get a little silly. Maybe one option is to add a >> 3rd param to aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_devices() and skip the logic >> to iterate over PCI bars and call aperture_remove_conflicting_devices() ? > > The thing I don't get: Why does this matter for gma500 and not any of > the other pci devices? Look at your gpu, realize there's a lot more Yes, I don't know why gma500 is special in that sense but I'm not familiar with that hardware to have an opinion on this. -- Best regards, Javier Martinez Canillas Core Platforms Red Hat
