Currently amdgpu calls drm_sched_fini() from the fence driver sw fini
routine - such function is expected to be called only after the
respective init function - drm_sched_init() - was executed successfully.
Happens that we faced a driver probe failure in the Steam Deck
recently, and the function drm_sched_fini() was called even without
its counter-part had been previously called, causing the following oops:
amdgpu: probe of 0000:04:00.0 failed with error -110
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000090
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
CPU: 0 PID: 609 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 6.2.0-rc3-gpiccoli #338
Hardware name: Valve Jupiter/Jupiter, BIOS F7A0113 11/04/2022
RIP: 0010:drm_sched_fini+0x84/0xa0 [gpu_sched]
[...]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
amdgpu_fence_driver_sw_fini+0xc8/0xd0 [amdgpu]
amdgpu_device_fini_sw+0x2b/0x3b0 [amdgpu]
amdgpu_driver_release_kms+0x16/0x30 [amdgpu]
devm_drm_dev_init_release+0x49/0x70
[...]
To prevent that, check if the drm_sched was properly initialized for a
given ring before calling its fini counter-part.
Notice ideally we'd use sched.ready for that; such field is set as the latest
thing on drm_sched_init(). But amdgpu seems to "override" the meaning of such
field - in the above oops for example, it was a GFX ring causing the crash, and
the sched.ready field was set to true in the ring init routine, regardless of
the state of the DRM scheduler. Hence, we ended-up using another sched field.
Fixes: 067f44c8b459 ("drm/amdgpu: avoid over-handle of fence driver fini in s3 test (v2)")
Cc: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Hi folks, first of all thanks in advance for reviews / comments!
Notice that I've used the Fixes tag more in the sense to bring it
to stable, I didn't find a good patch candidate that added the
call to drm_sched_fini(), was reaching way too old commits...so
067f44c8b459 seems a good candidate - or maybe not?
Now, with regards sched.ready, spent a bit of time to figure what
was happening...would be feasible maybe to stop using that to
mark some kind ring status? I think it should be possible to add a
flag to the ring structure for that, and free sched.ready from
being manipulate by the amdgpu driver, what's your thoughts on that?
I could try myself, but first of course I'd like to raise the
"temperature" on this topic and check if somebody is already working
on that.
Cheers,
Guilherme
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
index 00444203220d..e154eb8241fb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
@@ -618,7 +618,13 @@ void amdgpu_fence_driver_sw_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
if (!ring || !ring->fence_drv.initialized)
continue;
- if (!ring->no_scheduler)
+ /*
+ * Notice we check for sched.name since there's some
+ * override on the meaning of sched.ready by amdgpu.
+ * The natural check would be sched.ready, which is
+ * set as drm_sched_init() finishes...
+ */
+ if (!ring->no_scheduler && ring->sched.name)
drm_sched_fini(&ring->sched);
for (j = 0; j <= ring->fence_drv.num_fences_mask; ++j)
--
2.39.0
