On 11/28/22 19:16, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi > > Am 12.09.22 um 11:15 schrieb Uwe Kleine-König: >> While working on a drm driver that doesn't need the i2c algobit stuff I >> noticed that DRM selects this code even tough only 8 drivers actually use >> it. While also only some drivers use i2c, keep the select for I2C for the >> next cleanup patch. Still prepare this already by also selecting I2C for >> the individual drivers. >> >> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Changes since v1 >> (20210514100142.1182997-1-u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) from >> 2021-05-14: >> >> - rebased to next-20220909 >> was something around v5.13-rc2 before, required to fix context >> changes in the nouveau Kconfig file. git am -3 handled it just fine. >> >> I reverified that no new drivers were added that need a corresponding >> select. >> >> Best regards >> Uwe >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 5 ++++- >> drivers/gpu/drm/ast/Kconfig | 2 ++ >> drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/Kconfig | 2 ++ >> drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/Kconfig | 2 ++ >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Kconfig | 2 ++ >> drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/Kconfig | 2 ++ >> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/Kconfig | 2 ++ >> 7 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > amdgpu and radeon also include <linux/i2c-algo-bit.h>. Are they special > in some way? > Uwe, do you have an answer for this question? I wan to merge this patch but don't know if need to wait for a v3 including those drivers too. -- Best regards, Javier Martinez Canillas Core Platforms Red Hat
