Hi Arnd,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 6:05 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>
> The dsi_irq_stats structure is a little too big to fit on the
> stack of a 32-bit task, depending on the specific gcc options:
>
> fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c: In function 'dsi_dump_dsidev_irqs':
> fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c:1621:1: error: the frame size of 1064 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
>
> Since this is only a debugfs file, performance is not critical,
> so just dynamically allocate it, and print an error message
> in there in place of a failure code when the allocation fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Thanks for your patch!
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c
> @@ -1536,22 +1536,28 @@ static void dsi_dump_dsidev_irqs(struct platform_device *dsidev,
> {
> struct dsi_data *dsi = dsi_get_dsidrv_data(dsidev);
> unsigned long flags;
> - struct dsi_irq_stats stats;
> + struct dsi_irq_stats *stats;
> +
> + stats = kzalloc(sizeof(*stats), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!stats) {
> + seq_printf(s, "out of memory\n");
I guess this is futile?
No need to increase kernel size for OOM messages.
> + return;
> + }
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&dsi->irq_stats_lock, flags);
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
