Hi Nicolas, On Fri, 2022-08-19 at 10:09 +0800, Nancy.Lin wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > Thanks for the review. > > On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 17:47 -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote: > > Hi Nancy, > > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 03:52:42PM +0800, Nancy.Lin wrote: > > [..] > > > static const struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data > > > mt2701_mmsys_driver_data > > > = { > > > .clk_driver = "clk-mt2701-mm", > > > .routes = mmsys_default_routing_table, > > > @@ -86,6 +88,7 @@ static const struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data > > > mt8173_mmsys_driver_data = { > > > .routes = mmsys_default_routing_table, > > > .num_routes = ARRAY_SIZE(mmsys_default_routing_table), > > > .sw0_rst_offset = MT8183_MMSYS_SW0_RST_B, > > > + .num_resets = 32, > > > }; > > > > > > static const struct mtk_mmsys_match_data mt8173_mmsys_match_data > > > = > > > { > > > @@ -100,6 +103,7 @@ static const struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data > > > mt8183_mmsys_driver_data = { > > > .routes = mmsys_mt8183_routing_table, > > > .num_routes = ARRAY_SIZE(mmsys_mt8183_routing_table), > > > .sw0_rst_offset = MT8183_MMSYS_SW0_RST_B, > > > + .num_resets = 32, > > > }; > > > > > > static const struct mtk_mmsys_match_data mt8183_mmsys_match_data > > > = > > > { > > > @@ -114,6 +118,7 @@ static const struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data > > > mt8186_mmsys_driver_data = { > > > .routes = mmsys_mt8186_routing_table, > > > .num_routes = ARRAY_SIZE(mmsys_mt8186_routing_table), > > > .sw0_rst_offset = MT8186_MMSYS_SW0_RST_B, > > > + .num_resets = 32, > > > }; > > > > [..] > > > @@ -351,18 +362,6 @@ static int mtk_mmsys_probe(struct > > > platform_device *pdev) > > > return ret; > > > } > > > > > > - spin_lock_init(&mmsys->lock); > > > - > > > - mmsys->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE; > > > - mmsys->rcdev.nr_resets = 32; > > > > The number of resets was previously always set to 32, and now > > you're > > instead > > setting it based on num_resets from each machine. The issue is, > > you're > > forgetting a bunch of them. > > > > mt8192 didn't get a num_reset, so this commit breaks the display on > > mt8192 based > > devices. But mt8192 isn't the only one, there are other platforms > > missing this > > property. Please set num_resets to 32 in every single one of them, > > otherwise > > there will be display regressions. > > > > Thanks, > > Nícolas > > It's my mistake. I will set num_resets to 32 for every mmsys driver. > > Thanks, > Nancy After review the code, I think only the mmsys driver with the sw0_rst_offset setting should set num_resets to 32, otherwise it would set wrong addr in the mtk_mmsys_reset_update() function. Those mmsys without sw0_rst_offset set should not set num_resets to 32. Thanks, Nancy