Den 15.08.2022 09.35, skrev Maxime Ripard: > Hi Noralf, > > Thanks for your review > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 02:30:42PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: >> Den 29.07.2022 18.34, skrev Maxime Ripard: >>> The subconnector property was created by drm_mode_create_tv_properties(), >>> but wasn't exposed to the userspace through the generic >>> atomic_get/set_property implementation, and wasn't stored in any generic >>> state structure. >>> >>> Let's solve this. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> I just realised that this and the select_subconnector property isn't >> used by any drivers. Do you plan to use them? Maybe they don't need to >> be wired up at all. > > I'm not sure really > > It's true that the subconnector and select_subconnector fields in the TV > connector state aren't used by any driver, but the ch7006 and nouveau > will update the property content through a call to > drm_object_property_set_value > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/ch7006_drv.c#L217 > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/tvnv17.c#L185 > > I think it could still be useful to report it in the connector state, if > only for consistency? > Yeah maybe. I just realised that I have support in the GUD protocol for these properties so any future devices that rely on them them will need this patch, so I'm now suddenly in favor of this :) Noralf.