On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 4:08 PM Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Allen, > > On Thu, 7 Jul 2022 at 10:06, allen <allen.chen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From: allen chen <allen.chen@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Change power sequence to meet it6505 data sheet requirement when boot on. > > > > Signed-off-by: Pin-Yen Lin <treapking@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Allen Chen <allen.chen@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c > > index 2d119e3016b3..aa5e0aa1af85 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c > > @@ -3029,7 +3029,7 @@ static int it6505_init_pdata(struct it6505 *it6505) > > return PTR_ERR(pdata->ovdd); > > } > > > > - pdata->gpiod_reset = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH); > > + pdata->gpiod_reset = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW); > > Making this change is problematic since it requires a corresponding > change in all of the device trees that use this device. It's against > policy to change this interface after it has been introduced. > > Unless anyone thinks otherwise, I would like to see this patch dropped. I think you're confusing GPIO_ACTIVE_{LOW,HIGH} flags in the device tree vs GPIOD_OUT_{LOW,HIGH}, which just sets the "default" state the GPIO should be in when it is requested. This change doesn't impact the device tree. Regards ChenYu > > if (IS_ERR(pdata->gpiod_reset)) { > > dev_err(dev, "gpiod_reset gpio not found"); > > return PTR_ERR(pdata->gpiod_reset); > > -- > > 2.25.1 > >