Hi Robert,
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 4:07 PM Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Allen,
>
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2022 at 10:06, allen <allen.chen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: allen chen <allen.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Change power sequence to meet it6505 data sheet requirement when boot on.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pin-Yen Lin <treapking@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Allen Chen <allen.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c
> > index 2d119e3016b3..aa5e0aa1af85 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c
> > @@ -3029,7 +3029,7 @@ static int it6505_init_pdata(struct it6505 *it6505)
> > return PTR_ERR(pdata->ovdd);
> > }
> >
> > - pdata->gpiod_reset = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> > + pdata->gpiod_reset = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
>
> Making this change is problematic since it requires a corresponding
> change in all of the device trees that use this device. It's against
> policy to change this interface after it has been introduced.
>
> Unless anyone thinks otherwise, I would like to see this patch dropped.
I don't really understand why this would require corresponding change
in device trees.
Currently there's no real it6505 user on upstream. Also, the GPIO
value will be changed
in it6505_poweron, so this change only affects the power on sequence of it6505.
>
> > if (IS_ERR(pdata->gpiod_reset)) {
> > dev_err(dev, "gpiod_reset gpio not found");
> > return PTR_ERR(pdata->gpiod_reset);
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
