Hi Matthias,
Thanks for the review.
On Fri, 2022-07-08 at 17:34 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> On 22/06/2022 15:08, Nancy.Lin wrote:
> > Add mtk_mmsys_update_bits API. Simplify code for update mmsys reg.
> > It is a preparation for adding support for mmsys config API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nancy.Lin <nancy.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> > angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> > angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c | 37 +++++++++++++------------
> > -------
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
> > b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
> > index a74c86197d6a..ca5bf07114fa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
> > @@ -192,22 +192,27 @@ static int
> > mtk_mmsys_find_match_drvdata(struct mtk_mmsys *mmsys,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > +static void mtk_mmsys_update_bits(struct mtk_mmsys *mmsys, u32
> > offset, u32 mask, u32 val)
> > +{
> > + u32 tmp;
> > +
> > + tmp = readl_relaxed(mmsys->regs + offset);
> > + tmp = (tmp & ~mask) | val;
> > + writel_relaxed(tmp, mmsys->regs + offset);
> > +}
> > +
> > void mtk_mmsys_ddp_connect(struct device *dev,
> > enum mtk_ddp_comp_id cur,
> > enum mtk_ddp_comp_id next)
> > {
> > struct mtk_mmsys *mmsys = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > const struct mtk_mmsys_routes *routes = mmsys->data->routes;
> > - u32 reg;
> > int i;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < mmsys->data->num_routes; i++)
> > - if (cur == routes[i].from_comp && next ==
> > routes[i].to_comp) {
> > - reg = readl_relaxed(mmsys->regs +
> > routes[i].addr);
> > - reg &= ~routes[i].mask;
> > - reg |= routes[i].val;
> > - writel_relaxed(reg, mmsys->regs +
> > routes[i].addr);
> > - }
> > + if (cur == routes[i].from_comp && next ==
> > routes[i].to_comp)
> > + mtk_mmsys_update_bits(mmsys, routes[i].addr,
> > routes[i].mask,
> > + routes[i].val);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_mmsys_ddp_connect);
> >
> > @@ -217,15 +222,11 @@ void mtk_mmsys_ddp_disconnect(struct device
> > *dev,
> > {
> > struct mtk_mmsys *mmsys = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > const struct mtk_mmsys_routes *routes = mmsys->data->routes;
> > - u32 reg;
> > int i;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < mmsys->data->num_routes; i++)
> > - if (cur == routes[i].from_comp && next ==
> > routes[i].to_comp) {
> > - reg = readl_relaxed(mmsys->regs +
> > routes[i].addr);
> > - reg &= ~routes[i].mask;
> > - writel_relaxed(reg, mmsys->regs +
> > routes[i].addr);
> > - }
> > + if (cur == routes[i].from_comp && next ==
> > routes[i].to_comp)
> > + mtk_mmsys_update_bits(mmsys, routes[i].addr,
> > routes[i].mask, 0);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_mmsys_ddp_disconnect);
> >
> > @@ -234,18 +235,10 @@ static int mtk_mmsys_reset_update(struct
> > reset_controller_dev *rcdev, unsigned l
> > {
> > struct mtk_mmsys *mmsys = container_of(rcdev, struct mtk_mmsys,
> > rcdev);
> > unsigned long flags;
> > - u32 reg;
> >
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&mmsys->lock, flags);
> >
> > - reg = readl_relaxed(mmsys->regs + mmsys->data->sw0_rst_offset);
> > -
> > - if (assert)
> > - reg &= ~BIT(id);
> > - else
> > - reg |= BIT(id);
> > -
> > - writel_relaxed(reg, mmsys->regs + mmsys->data->sw0_rst_offset);
> > + mtk_mmsys_update_bits(mmsys, mmsys->data->sw0_rst_offset,
> > BIT(id), assert ? 0 : BIT(id));
>
> Let's be this a normal if (assert) else but calling
> mtk_mmsys_update_bits().
>
> Other then that patch looks good.
>
> Matthias
>
OK, I will change to
if (asssert)
mtk_mmsys_update_bits(mmsys, mmsys->data->sw0_rst_offset, BIT(id),
0);
else
mtk_mmsys_update_bits(mmsys, mmsys->data->sw0_rst_offset, BIT(id),
BIT(id));
BRs,
Nancy
> >
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mmsys->lock, flags);
> >
