On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 17:32:25 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote: > > @@ -208,12 +232,14 @@ static int slpc_force_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 freq) > */ > > with_intel_runtime_pm(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref) { > - ret = slpc_set_param(slpc, > - SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ, > - freq); > + /* Non-blocking request will avoid stalls */ > + ret = slpc_set_param_nb(slpc, > + SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ, > + freq); > if (ret) > - i915_probe_error(i915, "Unable to force min freq to %u: %d", > - freq, ret); > + drm_notice(&i915->drm, > + "Failed to send set_param for min freq(%d): (%d)\n", > + freq, ret); I am still thinking if we should replace drm_notice() by i915_probe_error() since drm_notice() will basically hide any issues of boost/de-boost's getting dropped. Another idea here might be to maintain a counter, say "slpc->failed_boosts" which we increment each time slpc_set_param_nb() fails and dump that counter via intel_guc_slpc_print_info(). Anyway for now this is: Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@xxxxxxxxx>