On 06/08, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Melissa, > > On 6/8/22 17:51, Melissa Wen wrote: > > [snip] > > >>> > >>> I can take the last 3 patches through the Broadcom ARM SoC pull request, > >>> but the first three should probably go via the DRM tree unless you want > >>> me to merge them all? > >> > >> I can merge the first 3 patches through the drm-misc tree. Can I get > >> an ack from you for those ? > >> > >> The changes are independent so there's no need for an immutable branch > >> or any kind of cross tree coordination. > > > > Hi Javier, > > > > I'm not sure if you're suggesting here to apply the entire series as it > > is now. > > > > No. I suggested that could just apply the first 3 patches that were related > to DRM, not the last 3 three since Florian will pick those. > > > I'm not able to have a functional kernel from arm defconfig, only for > > arm64. I'd like to have this issue clarified before merge this serie. I > > tried multi_v7_defconfig on raspbian 32-bits and got a kernel panic. > > Things work better when using downstream bcm2711_defconfig. > > > > If you have an idea of what is going on, please, let me know. I can try > > Can you please share for info? For example your boot log when it panics, > maybe that could shed some light on what's going on. > > > again and I'll be okay on merging it. Otherwise, let's wait for more > > inputs to have a better picture of the situation. > > > > Of course I don't plan to push patches that are known to cause issues. > > I mentioned that could help merging the DRM changes if needed before > you sent your bug report. Hi Javier, Thanks for waiting a little. Stefan guided me to the missing part and I'm okay on this serie. If there's any r-b missing for drm/v3d, you can add mine: Reviewed-by: Melissa Wen <mwen@xxxxxxxxxx> But if you prefer that I applied them, just let me know. Best Regards, Melissa > > -- > Best regards, > > Javier Martinez Canillas > Linux Engineering > Red Hat >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
