Hello Florian, On 6/8/22 11:26, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > On 6/3/2022 11:26 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> This is a follow up from my v4 patchset. The power management pieces have >> been split out to a separate independent set of patches by Stefan [1]. This >> version 5 of the DRM patches are independent and given the V3D driver has >> been upstream for some time the two patches to enable it in defconfigs can >> be taken at anytime independent of the enablement for the Raspberry Pi 4. >> >> I've tested this using mesa 22.0.x and Wayland/Gnome on Fedora 36, it's >> more or less stable with basic testing. >> >> Changes since v5: >> - Update the DT compatible to match the others that were updated >> - Adjust the Kconfig help text >> - Add review tags >> >> Changes since v4: >> - Fixes for device tree and bindings >> - Split out the power management changes into an independent set >> - Rebase to 5.18 >> - Individual changes in patches >> >> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg980342.html > > I can take the last 3 patches through the Broadcom ARM SoC pull request, > but the first three should probably go via the DRM tree unless you want > me to merge them all? I can merge the first 3 patches through the drm-misc tree. Can I get an ack from you for those ? The changes are independent so there's no need for an immutable branch or any kind of cross tree coordination. -- Best regards, Javier Martinez Canillas Linux Engineering Red Hat
