Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: mediatek: add vdosys1 RDMA definition for mt8195

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 6:28 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 09/05/2022 10:45, Rex-BC Chen wrote:
> >>> +    soc {
> >>> +        #address-cells = <2>;
> >>> +        #size-cells = <2>;
> >>> +
> >>> +        vdo1_rdma0: mdp-rdma@1c104000 {
> >>
> >> Generic node name. dma-controller (if it does not conflict with
> >> dma-common.yaml schema)?
> >
> > We don't understand what dma-controller you are referring to? Can you
> > help explain more? Thanks!
>
> Use a generic node name, as Devicetree spec asks:
> "The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function
> of the device and not its precise programming
>
> model. If appropriate, the name should be one of the following choices:"
>
> I proposed dma-controller, but feel free to find better generic node name.

dma-controller is covered by dma-controller.yaml, which references
dma-common.yaml in its entirety, so I don't think that would work.

What about "blitter"? I think that is a generic term that is/was commonly
used with display hardware and sort of describes the function of the RDMA
& WDMA blocks, and if only one side is memory and the other is the display
pipeline.


Regards
ChenYu



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux