Hello Thomas, On 4/29/22 11:14, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi > > Am 29.04.22 um 10:42 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas: >> The DRIVER_FIRMWARE flag denotes that a DRM driver uses a framebuffer >> that was initialized and provided by the system firmware for scanout. >> >> Indicate to the fbdev subsystem that the registered framebuffer is a >> FBINFO_MISC_FIRMWARE, so that it can handle accordingly. For example, >> wold hot-unplug the associated device if asked to remove conflicting >> framebuffers. >> >> Suggested-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> >> (no changes since v1) >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c >> index d265a73313c9..76dd11888621 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c >> @@ -1891,6 +1891,10 @@ __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock(struct drm_fb_helper *fb_helper, >> /* don't leak any physical addresses to userspace */ >> info->flags |= FBINFO_HIDE_SMEM_START; >> >> + /* Indicate that the framebuffer is provided by the firmware */ >> + if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_FIRMWARE)) >> + info->flags |= FBINFO_MISC_FIRMWARE; >> + > > Patches 1 to 3 should be squashed into one before landing. > I actually considered this but then decided to go with the each change goes into its own patch approach. But I'll squash it in next revisions. > We can do this with DRIVER_FIRMWARE. Alternatively, I'd suggest to we > could also used the existing final parameter of > drm_fbdev_generic_setup() to pass a flag that designates a firmware device. > By existing final parameter you mean @preferred_bpp ? That doesn't seem correct. I also like that by using DRIVER_FIRMWARE it is completely data driven and transparent to the DRM driver. Or do you envision a case where a driver would be DRIVER_FIRMWARE but we wouldn't want the emulated fbdev to also be FBINFO_MISC_FIRMWARE ? -- Best regards, Javier Martinez Canillas Linux Engineering Red Hat