Hi all,
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 10:10:14 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:34:05 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the amdgpu tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > fee2ede15542 ("drm/ttm: rework bulk move handling v5")
> >
> > from the drm-misc tree and commit:
> >
> > 184a69ca4d41 ("drm/amdgpu: separate VM PT handling into amdgpu_vm_pt.c")
> >
> > from the amdgpu tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (I used this file from the latter and added the following
> > patch) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as
> > linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned
> > to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.
> > You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the
> > conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
> >
> > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:28:53 +1000
> > Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "drm/ttm: rework bulk move handling v5"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c | 9 +++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c
> > index 958d7ed97882..a29933fa001f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c
> > @@ -630,7 +630,14 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_pt_free(struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base *entry)
> >
> > if (!entry->bo)
> > return;
> > +
> > shadow = amdgpu_bo_shadowed(entry->bo);
> > + if (shadow) {
> > + ttm_bo_set_bulk_move(&shadow->tbo, NULL);
> > + amdgpu_bo_unref(&shadow);
> > + }
> > +
> > + ttm_bo_set_bulk_move(&entry->bo->tbo, NULL);
> > entry->bo->vm_bo = NULL;
> > list_del(&entry->vm_status);
> > amdgpu_bo_unref(&shadow);
> > @@ -653,8 +660,6 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_pt_free_dfs(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> > struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor cursor;
> > struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base *entry;
> >
> > - vm->bulk_moveable = false;
> > -
> > for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt_dfs_safe(adev, vm, start, cursor, entry)
> > amdgpu_vm_pt_free(entry);
> >
> > --
> > 2.35.1
>
> This is now a conflict between the drm tree and the amdgpu tree.
I noticed that commit 184a69ca4d41 was merged into the drm tree but
only the second hunk of this merge fixup was applied. So is the first
hunk above unnecessary?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpBC_EbN6Hpd.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
