Hi all, On Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:34:05 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the amdgpu tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c > > between commit: > > fee2ede15542 ("drm/ttm: rework bulk move handling v5") > > from the drm-misc tree and commit: > > 184a69ca4d41 ("drm/amdgpu: separate VM PT handling into amdgpu_vm_pt.c") > > from the amdgpu tree. > > I fixed it up (I used this file from the latter and added the following > patch) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as > linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned > to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. > You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the > conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. > > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:28:53 +1000 > Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "drm/ttm: rework bulk move handling v5" > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c | 9 +++++++-- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c > index 958d7ed97882..a29933fa001f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c > @@ -630,7 +630,14 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_pt_free(struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base *entry) > > if (!entry->bo) > return; > + > shadow = amdgpu_bo_shadowed(entry->bo); > + if (shadow) { > + ttm_bo_set_bulk_move(&shadow->tbo, NULL); > + amdgpu_bo_unref(&shadow); > + } > + > + ttm_bo_set_bulk_move(&entry->bo->tbo, NULL); > entry->bo->vm_bo = NULL; > list_del(&entry->vm_status); > amdgpu_bo_unref(&shadow); > @@ -653,8 +660,6 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_pt_free_dfs(struct amdgpu_device *adev, > struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor cursor; > struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base *entry; > > - vm->bulk_moveable = false; > - > for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt_dfs_safe(adev, vm, start, cursor, entry) > amdgpu_vm_pt_free(entry); > > -- > 2.35.1 This is now a conflict between the drm tree and the amdgpu tree. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpHs33l1Zi6F.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature