Hello Ian,
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 09:57:27AM -0400, Ian Cowan wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 08:47:11AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 03:21:28PM -0400, Ian Cowan wrote:
> > > Removed an unnecessary semicolon at the end of a macro call
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ian Cowan <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft.h | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft.h b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft.h
> > > index 2c2b5f1c1df3..aa66760e1a9c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft.h
> > > @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id dt_ids[] = { \
> > > { .compatible = _compatible }, \
> > > {}, \
> > > }; \
> > > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, dt_ids);
> > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, dt_ids)
> >
> > In fact the ; after MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE is necessary. There is only a
> > single instance in the kernel without a semicolon[1]. That's in
> > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-microchip-host.c and this only works because
> > this driver cannot be compiled as a module and so MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE
> > evaluates to nothing. Will send a patch for that one.
FTR: Patch was sent: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20220420065832.14173-1-u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> When I built this, it appeared to succeed. I used the command "make
> M=/drivers/staging/fbtft modules". Is this incorrect? For reference this
> is my first patch so it's highly likely I did this incorrectly.
I don't know for sure, but I'd have said that the M= stuff is for
out-of-tree modules only.
I'd recommend:
make allmodconfig
make drivers/staging/fbtft/
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
