On Mon, 11 Apr 2022, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > v3 of [1] fixing the (!x == 0) mistake. Resending the entire thing with > hopes the test robot picks up the baseline better; I haven't had much > luck with --in-reply-to for that. There were some issues with our CI, but I'm pretty sure they were not caused by the series. Fingers crossed. Thanks for the reviews, pushed. BR, Jani. > > BR, > Jani. > > [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/102329/ > > Jani Nikula (12): > drm/edid: convert edid_is_zero() to edid_block_is_zero() for blocks > drm/edid: have edid_block_check() detect blocks that are all zero > drm/edid: refactor EDID block status printing > drm/edid: add a helper to log dump an EDID block > drm/edid: pass struct edid to connector_bad_edid() > drm/edid: add typedef for block read function > drm/edid: abstract an EDID block read helper > drm/edid: use EDID block read helper in drm_do_get_edid() > drm/edid: convert extension block read to EDID block read helper > drm/edid: drop extra local var > drm/edid: add single point of return to drm_do_get_edid() > drm/edid: add EDID block count and size helpers > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 350 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 225 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-) -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
