On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 06:52:28PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 06:33:53PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > Whenever we are not able to get enough timeslots
> > for required PBN, let's try to allocate those
> > using DSC, just same way as we do for SST.
> >
> > Those patches are experimental yet, i.e not
> > for merging, still need to be tested with
> > proper DSC display, submitting those to check
> > ig nothing else blows up at least.
> >
> > v2: Add DSC checks to intel_dp_mst_mode_valid_ctx, similar
> > to ones we have in intel_dp_mode_valid(Manasi Navare)
> >
> > v3: Removed redundant edp condition logic from MST DSC
> > handling(Manasi Navare)
> >
> > v4: - Fixed forgotten force_dsc_en condition which was
> > always enabled for testing purposes(Manasi Navare)
> > - Properly process ret == EDEADLK, thus fixing the
> > regression caused by WARN triggered with modeset_lock.
> >
> > v5: - Removed redundant check(Imre Deak)
> >
> > Acked-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 138 ++++++++++++++++--
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h | 17 +++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 146 +++++++++++++++++++-
> > 3 files changed, 285 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > index 9e19165fd175..b04771e495cc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > @@ -115,7 +115,6 @@ bool intel_dp_is_edp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > }
> >
> > static void intel_dp_unset_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> > -static int intel_dp_dsc_compute_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 dsc_max_bpc);
> >
> > /* Is link rate UHBR and thus 128b/132b? */
> > bool intel_dp_is_uhbr(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > @@ -667,11 +666,12 @@ small_joiner_ram_size_bits(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > return 6144 * 8;
> > }
> >
> > -static u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > - u32 link_clock, u32 lane_count,
> > - u32 mode_clock, u32 mode_hdisplay,
> > - bool bigjoiner,
> > - u32 pipe_bpp)
> > +u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > + u32 link_clock, u32 lane_count,
> > + u32 mode_clock, u32 mode_hdisplay,
> > + bool bigjoiner,
> > + u32 pipe_bpp,
> > + u32 timeslots)
> > {
> > u32 bits_per_pixel, max_bpp_small_joiner_ram;
> > int i;
> > @@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ static u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > * for MST -> TimeSlotsPerMTP has to be calculated
> > */
> > bits_per_pixel = (link_clock * lane_count * 8) /
> > - intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock);
> > + (intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock) * timeslots);
> > drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Max link bpp: %u\n", bits_per_pixel);
> >
> > /* Small Joiner Check: output bpp <= joiner RAM (bits) / Horiz. width */
> > @@ -737,9 +737,9 @@ static u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > return bits_per_pixel << 4;
> > }
> >
> > -static u8 intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > - int mode_clock, int mode_hdisplay,
> > - bool bigjoiner)
> > +u8 intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > + int mode_clock, int mode_hdisplay,
> > + bool bigjoiner)
> > {
> > struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > u8 min_slice_count, i;
> > @@ -902,8 +902,8 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid_downstream(struct intel_connector *connector,
> > return MODE_OK;
> > }
> >
> > -static bool intel_dp_need_bigjoiner(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > - int hdisplay, int clock)
> > +bool intel_dp_need_bigjoiner(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > + int hdisplay, int clock)
> > {
> > struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> >
> > @@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
> > target_clock,
> > mode->hdisplay,
> > bigjoiner,
> > - pipe_bpp) >> 4;
> > + pipe_bpp, 1) >> 4;
> > dsc_slice_count =
> > intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(intel_dp,
> > target_clock,
> > @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config_wide(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > -static int intel_dp_dsc_compute_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 max_req_bpc)
> > +int intel_dp_dsc_compute_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 max_req_bpc)
> > {
> > struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > int i, num_bpc;
> > @@ -1429,7 +1429,8 @@ static int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> > adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay,
> > pipe_config->bigjoiner_pipes,
> > - pipe_bpp);
> > + pipe_bpp,
> > + 1);
> > dsc_dp_slice_count =
> > intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(intel_dp,
> > adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> > @@ -1444,7 +1445,114 @@ static int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > dsc_max_output_bpp >> 4,
> > pipe_config->pipe_bpp);
> > pipe_config->dsc.slice_count = dsc_dp_slice_count;
> > + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "DSC: compressed bpp %d slice count %d\n",
> > + pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp,
> > + pipe_config->dsc.slice_count);
> > }
> > + /*
> > + * VDSC engine operates at 1 Pixel per clock, so if peak pixel rate
> > + * is greater than the maximum Cdclock and if slice count is even
> > + * then we need to use 2 VDSC instances.
> > + */
> > + if (adjusted_mode->crtc_clock > dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq) {
> > + if (pipe_config->dsc.slice_count > 1) {
> > + pipe_config->dsc.dsc_split = true;
> > + } else {
> > + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > + "Cannot split stream to use 2 VDSC instances\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = intel_dp_dsc_compute_params(&dig_port->base, pipe_config);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > + "Cannot compute valid DSC parameters for Input Bpp = %d "
> > + "Compressed BPP = %d\n",
> > + pipe_config->pipe_bpp,
> > + pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + pipe_config->dsc.compression_enable = true;
> > + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "DP DSC computed with Input Bpp = %d "
> > + "Compressed Bpp = %d Slice Count = %d\n",
> > + pipe_config->pipe_bpp,
> > + pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp,
> > + pipe_config->dsc.slice_count);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int intel_dp_mst_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > + struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> > + struct drm_connector_state *conn_state,
> > + struct link_config_limits *limits,
> > + int timeslots)
> > +{
> > + struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
> > + const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
> > + &pipe_config->hw.adjusted_mode;
> > + int pipe_bpp;
> > + int ret;
> > + u16 dsc_max_output_bpp;
> > + u8 dsc_dp_slice_count;
> > +
> > + pipe_config->fec_enable = !intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) &&
> > + intel_dp_supports_fec(intel_dp, pipe_config);
> > +
> > + if (!intel_dp_supports_dsc(intel_dp, pipe_config))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + pipe_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_compute_bpp(intel_dp, conn_state->max_requested_bpc);
> > +
> > + /* Min Input BPC for ICL+ is 8 */
> > + if (pipe_bpp < 8 * 3) {
> > + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > + "No DSC support for less than 8bpc\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * For now enable DSC for max bpp, max link rate, max lane count.
> > + * Optimize this later for the minimum possible link rate/lane count
> > + * with DSC enabled for the requested mode.
> > + */
> > + pipe_config->pipe_bpp = pipe_bpp;
> > + pipe_config->port_clock = limits->max_rate;
> > + pipe_config->lane_count = limits->max_lane_count;
> > +
> > + dsc_max_output_bpp =
> > + intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(dev_priv,
> > + pipe_config->port_clock,
> > + pipe_config->lane_count,
> > + adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> > + adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay,
> > + pipe_config->bigjoiner_pipes,
> > + pipe_bpp,
> > + timeslots);
> > +
> > + dsc_dp_slice_count =
> > + intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(intel_dp,
> > + adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> > + adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay,
> > + pipe_config->bigjoiner_pipes);
> > +
> > + if (!dsc_max_output_bpp || !dsc_dp_slice_count) {
> > + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > + "Compressed BPP/Slice Count not supported\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp = min_t(u16,
> > + dsc_max_output_bpp >> 4,
> > + pipe_config->pipe_bpp);
> > +
> > + pipe_config->dsc.slice_count = dsc_dp_slice_count;
> > + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "MST DSC: compressed bpp %d slice count %d\n",
> > + pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp,
> > + pipe_config->dsc.slice_count);
> >
>
> That looks like 100% copy-pasta from the existing function.
> Please refactor if you can't just call the existing function
> directly for some reason.
Yep, the main change was mostly just to propagate new timeslots
parameter to intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp - currentl function has it
hardcoded as 1.
I will check what can be done to somehow formalize this better, so
that there would be only single function used for both cases.
Stan
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
