On 2/1/22 23:29, Simon Ser wrote: > On Tuesday, February 1st, 2022 at 21:57, Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> As I wrote in another part of this thread(s) - typing the patch is easy. >> But I do not understand the userspace implications so I need someone >> else to say go. > > User-space shouldn't really use the connector for anything except making it > easier for the user to understand where to plug the display cable. I think a > generic "panel" connector type makes sense. > I'll drop this patch from the series. I didn't have all the context and thought that was an opportunity to add an I2C type, since there was a SPI type already. But seems to be more controversial than I expected and shouldn't really matter for a tiny driver like this. I will just go ahead and use the Unknown type. Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Linux Engineering Red Hat
