On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 06:32:46PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 01:35:47PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 05:39:33PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > > Am 10.11.21 um 17:34 schrieb Andy Shevchenko: > > > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 3:55 PM Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Am 10.11.21 um 11:24 schrieb Andy Shevchenko: > > > > ... > > > > > > > > +#include <linux/container_of.h> > > > > > > > > > > I built this patch on a recent drm-misc-next, but there's no > > > > > linux/container_of.h > > > > > > > > Thank you for trying. It's in the upstream, whenever drm-misc-next > > > > switches to newer/newest upstream it will be there. I assume it will > > > > happen after v5.16-rc1? > > > > > > Yes, we'll certainly backmerge soon after rc1 has been released. If I forget > > > to add the patch then, please send a reminder. > > > > > > Once the necessary headers are available, > > > > $ git log --oneline v5.16-rc1 -- include/linux/container_of.h > > e1edc277e6f6 linux/container_of.h: switch to static_assert > > d2a8ebbf8192 kernel.h: split out container_of() and typeof_member() macros > > > > > the patch is > > > Acked-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> > > > > Thanks! > > Maybe I misunderstood something, I thought that DRM people may apply this, > is it incorrect assumption? It still does not appear in Linux Next... What should I do to move this forward, please? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
