On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 7:39 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 07:21:57PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > It's perfectly valid to dereference the pointer in atomic_enable, and > > > that patch would consume memory for no particular reason. > > > > Again, I'm not pointing any mistake in dereference and certainly not > > understand about what memory consumption issue here. > > You add a struct drm_display_mode field to struct sun6i_dsi. It > increases the size of struct sun6i_dsi of sizeof(struct > drm_display_mode). > > > I'm doing it here since I'm doing it via mode_set in other drivers. No > > problem for me either way. > > But *why* are you doing so? > > There might be a valid reason in other drivers, but there's none here > (that you mentioned at least). The reason is to use existing bridge function instead of dereference ie what I've mentioned. I don't have any other reasons. Jagan.
