On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:10:57AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 5:17 AM Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I'm sorry, but I find that situation to be a bit ridiculous. > > Honestly, the original report about the pulseaudio problem came in > over two weeks ago, and all you seemed to do was to ignore everything > that Sudip said and reported. > > THAT is the ridiculous part. > > The rules for the kernel are very clear: regressions get fixed or they > get reverted. And I saw absolutely _zero_ indication that you took > that pulseaudio oops at all seriously. I wasn't questioning the revert itself though, I can see how you took that decision for the audio patch. What I was interested in was more about the context itself, and I'd still like an answer on whether it's ok to wait for a review for 5 months though, or if it's an expectation from now on that we are supposed to fix bugs over the week-end. Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
