On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 5:17 AM Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm sorry, but I find that situation to be a bit ridiculous.
Honestly, the original report about the pulseaudio problem came in
over two weeks ago, and all you seemed to do was to ignore everything
that Sudip said and reported.
THAT is the ridiculous part.
The rules for the kernel are very clear: regressions get fixed or they
get reverted. And I saw absolutely _zero_ indication that you took
that pulseaudio oops at all seriously.
Linus
