Am 23.06.21 um 11:12 schrieb huqiqiao:
kvmalloc_array + __GFP_ZERO is the same with kvcalloc.
Signed-off-by: huqiqiao <huqiqiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
index 9acee4a5b2ba..50edc73525b0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
@@ -908,9 +908,8 @@ static int amdgpu_vm_alloc_pts(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
unsigned num_entries;
num_entries = amdgpu_vm_num_entries(adev, cursor->level);
- entry->entries = kvmalloc_array(num_entries,
- sizeof(*entry->entries),
- GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
+ entry->entries = kvcalloc(num_entries,
+ sizeof(*entry->entries), GFP_KERNEL);
Sounds like a good idea in general, but the indentation on the second
line seems to be of.
Christian.
if (!entry->entries)
return -ENOMEM;
}