On 14/04/2021 10:06, Robert Foss wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 08:13, Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> Le 13/04/2021 à 22:21, Robert Foss a écrit :
>>> Hey Neil & Phong,
>>>
>>> Thanks for submitting this series!
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct drm_bridge_funcs it66121_bridge_funcs = {
>>>> + .attach = it66121_bridge_attach,
>>>> + .enable = it66121_bridge_enable,
>>>> + .disable = it66121_bridge_disable,
>>>> + .mode_set = it66121_bridge_mode_set,
>>>> + .mode_valid = it66121_bridge_mode_valid,
>>>> + .detect = it66121_bridge_detect,
>>>> + .get_edid = it66121_bridge_get_edid,
>>>> + .atomic_get_output_bus_fmts = it66121_bridge_atomic_get_output_bus_fmts,
>>>> + .atomic_get_input_bus_fmts = it66121_bridge_atomic_get_input_bus_fmts,
>>>> +};
>>>
>>> I would like to see an implementation of HPD, since it is supported by
>>> the hardware[1] (and required by the documentation). IRQ status bit 0
>>> seems to be the responsible for notifying us about hot plug detection
>>> events.
>>
>> It's implemented in the IRQ handler with the IT66121_INT_STATUS1_HPD_STATUS event.
>>
>
> I didn't even get that far :)
>
> Either way, the HPD support should be exposed in drm_bridge_funcs
> (.hpd_enable, .hpd_disable (and possibly .hpd_notify)) and
> drm_bridge.ops (DRM_BRIDGE_OP_HPD).
>
Indeed I forgot these calls in the NO_CONNECTOR implementation...
Neil
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
