On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 08:13, Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> Le 13/04/2021 à 22:21, Robert Foss a écrit :
> > Hey Neil & Phong,
> >
> > Thanks for submitting this series!
> >
> >> +
> >> +static const struct drm_bridge_funcs it66121_bridge_funcs = {
> >> + .attach = it66121_bridge_attach,
> >> + .enable = it66121_bridge_enable,
> >> + .disable = it66121_bridge_disable,
> >> + .mode_set = it66121_bridge_mode_set,
> >> + .mode_valid = it66121_bridge_mode_valid,
> >> + .detect = it66121_bridge_detect,
> >> + .get_edid = it66121_bridge_get_edid,
> >> + .atomic_get_output_bus_fmts = it66121_bridge_atomic_get_output_bus_fmts,
> >> + .atomic_get_input_bus_fmts = it66121_bridge_atomic_get_input_bus_fmts,
> >> +};
> >
> > I would like to see an implementation of HPD, since it is supported by
> > the hardware[1] (and required by the documentation). IRQ status bit 0
> > seems to be the responsible for notifying us about hot plug detection
> > events.
>
> It's implemented in the IRQ handler with the IT66121_INT_STATUS1_HPD_STATUS event.
>
I didn't even get that far :)
Either way, the HPD support should be exposed in drm_bridge_funcs
(.hpd_enable, .hpd_disable (and possibly .hpd_notify)) and
drm_bridge.ops (DRM_BRIDGE_OP_HPD).
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
