Hi Vinod, On Thu, 2021-03-25 at 12:58 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On 18-03-21, 10:22, Liu Ying wrote: > > > > Can we have these in kernel-doc style please, similar to style in linux/phy/phy.h > > > > I take this way of in-line member documentation comment for the below 3 > > reasons: > > > > 1) Members of struct phy_configure_opts_mipi_dphy and > > struct phy_configure_opts_dp use the same way of comment. > > The structures are defined in linux/phy/phy-mipi-dphy.h and > > linux/phy/phy-dp.h respectively. > > Aligning to them makes a bit sense, IMHO. > > > > 2) In-line member documentation comments[1] are mentioned in kernel-doc > > guide. It says 'The structure members may also be documented in-line > > within the definition.'. > > > > 3) Even the 'configure' and 'validate' members of struct phy_ops use > > the same way of comment. struct phy_ops is defined in linux/phy/phy.h. > > > > [1] > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.kernel.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Flatest%2Fdoc-guide%2Fkernel-doc.html%23in-line-member-documentation-comments&data=04%7C01%7Cvictor.liu%40nxp.com%7C5f33165920d0484dec4d08d8ef5faabe%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637522541498852343%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=l25%2FXc0Xu2aH%2Fi7cSUqTsKae9L6BTddbhbV3vVRyON0%3D&reserved=0 > > It 'may be' but I would like all headers of a subsystem to display one > style. As I said linux/phy/phy.h use a style which we should use > everywhere. I've sent v5 out with this comment addressed. Thanks, Liu Ying > > Thanks > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
